Rumors of a remastered version ofDiablo 2were revived last month when developer Vicarious Visions was merged into Blizzard Entertainment. First reported by Bloomberg, a team fromVicarious Visions is reportedly working onDiablo 2: Resurrected.Blizzard has yet to officially announce the title, but during a recent investor call, it hinted that more remastered content is slated for release this year. BlizzConline is less than two weeks away, so the company may be planning to reveal the project then, though this is just speculation.
The timing would make sense. This year marks the 25th anniversary of theDiabloseries, andDiablo 2has stood the test of time as a fan favorite. With upcoming mobile entryDiablo Immortalonly generating modest hype andDiablo 4likely years away, aDiablo 2remaster would be a great way to keep fans engaged. But such an undertaking would present its own set of challenges. After last year’s disastrous release ofWarcraft 3: Reforged, scrutiny will be at an all-time high, and if Blizzard wants aDiablo 2re-releaseto feel like it did in 2000, reproducing that experience will be no simple task.
RELATED:Activision Remasters That Could Come in 2021 and Beyond
Remaster or Remake?
One of the biggestobstacles to remasteringDiablo 2is that the original source code and assets are nowhere to be found. According to David Brevik, Project and Design Lead for the originalDiablo 2,the backup storage containing the game’s code became corrupted close to release. Luckily, a few developers had test versions of the game on their personal computers, and the final version was able to be reconstructed using those pieces of code. The root code and assets were ultimately lost, so if Blizzard were to try to recreateDiablo 2today, it would have to start from scratch.
Such a feat is certainly possible, but Brevik is doubtful that it would result in the same game. With many of the underlying systems missing, it would be difficult tocreate a version ofDiablo 2that feels true to the original. And ifDiablo 2: Resurrectedis ultimately a remake, then it’s unclear if such a project is worth the effort.Diablo 4is already bringing back quite a few elements fromDiablo 2, and the excitement of seeing those elements return could be undercut by releasing aDiablo 2remake just a year or two prior.
Lessons from Warcraft 3: Reforged
Warcraft 3: Reforgedis one of Blizzard’s biggest blunders in recent memory. The title failed to deliver on many of its promises, earning one of the lowest Metacritic user scores in history, as the subpar remaster could be blamed on a number of missteps, from a rushed development process to misleading advertising. No one can blame the many fans who are wary of Blizzard remasters, and fairly so. If Blizzard wants to reestablish trust with its players,Diablo 2: Resurrectedwill need to avoid themistakes that plaguedWarcraft 3: Reforged.
RELATED:Diablo 2 Vs Diablo 3: Which Game Is Better?
Most importantly, the developer will need to present a clear vision of what gamers can expect from the title and stick to it. One of the maincomplaints aboutWarcraft 3: Reforgedwas that Blizzard had announced the remaster in 2018 by showing off a reimagined cutscene from the infamous Culling of Stratholme. When the game launched in 2020, that version was nowhere to be found. To be fair, this was partially due to mixed reactions from the Blizzard community, with manyWC3fans expressing concern that the changes were too radical. Blizzard’s ultimate decision to make more conservative changes to the in-game cutscenes left fans who had been excited about the new style sorely disappointed.
It’s unclear to what extent Blizzard considered fan reactions when making this decision, but hopefully, it will avoid this kind of confusion withDiablo 2: Resurrected.If the released version doesn’t match what’s advertised, Blizzard could be looking at another fiasco. On the other hand, therumored release date forDiablo 2: Resurrectedis soon enough that this might be a non-issue. If the title is scheduled for release this year, then there may not be enough time for the final product to deviate drastically from what Blizzard shows off later this month.
Don’t Mess With the Original
Another issue withWarcraft 3: Reforgedwas that it made the original version ofWarcraft 3unplayable. Players who owned the original title but not the remaster were forced to download a new client to play the game. The client wasn’t properly set up for online play upon release, so players ofWC3 Classicsuddenly lost access to features that had been available for 18 years. Clans and ranked matchmaking went out the window in the blink of an eye.Diablo 2still has a thriving online community, and it would be a shame to see it wiped out by a purported upgrade.
Hopefully, Blizzard will leave the original client intact forDiablo 2 Classic, as it will likely come to be called. While manyDiablo 2fans are excited by the prospect of a remaster, this isn’t true for all of them. Some players prefer the game as it exists today. Given the difficulty offaithfully reconstructingDiablo 2’s gameplay, there’s a danger thatDiablo 2:Resurrectedwill feel more likeDiablo 2.5. WhileDiablofans are used to the world of Sanctuary being reimagined with each iteration of the game, those changes would be far less welcome if they came at the cost of being able to play the original.
Warcraft 3: Reforgednotwithstanding, Blizzard has generally done a good job of allowing players to choose which version of a game they wish to play. With any luck, the company will approachDiablo 2: Resurrectedthe same way it handledWorld of Warcraft Classic, allowing two versions of the game to exist at the same time. However, the dissolution of Team 1, which had been responsible for maintaining Blizzard’s library of classic games, raises some questions about whether the company will continue this approach moving forward.
Diablo 2: Resurrectedis rumored to be in development.
MORE:Diablo 4 Has a Rich History of Classes to Draw From
