It’s safe to say that Scrappy-Doo has not been remembered fondly, at least not by the various people behind the more recent iterations of theScooby-Doofranchise. When the infamous puppy made a cameo inScooby: Doo Mystery Incorporatedhe was treated as a painful memory for Fred. Even that was kinder to Scooby’s nephew than how he was treated in the first live actionScooby-Doomovie: being turned into a villain who wanted to use Scooby for his own ends. But as much as Scrappy has been hated on over the years, it might finally be time to welcome the character back into the franchise, and see if he can be done right.
As a character, Scrappy-Doo could be obnoxious, but his main problem was he was used too often. From the late seventies, to the mid eighties, he shared top billing in theScooby-Doocartoons with his uncle Scooby, and was featured as prominently as the franchise’s titular character. That’s just too much Scrappy. His whole shtick can easily get grating after a while, and even if it didn’t, there are only so many places you can go with the whole “puppy almost ruins the plan by trying to pick a fight with the ghost” angle. If the character was brought back as a semi-returning character who had a couple of multi-episode story arcs, it would allow the writers to explore new ground with him while keeping elements of the original version, without running the risk of him overstaying his welcome and putting audiences off the character all over again.
RELATED:Scooby-Doo’s Blair Witch Parody Went Way Harder Than Anyone Expected
Scrappy-Doo is remembered for two main things; his constant attempts to pick a fight with the ghosts, monsters, and other strange things the gang comes across, and his unending admiration for his uncle Scooby. Both these qualities would be perfect for giving him his own character arcs within a new show. In his first few episodes the writers could have the character show up exactly as he has always been, and learn that it isn’t smart to run headlong into danger. He could then become a Scrappy who is still eager to face obstacles and adversaries rather than run from them, but maybe with a bit of thought put into how he does it It could even be a fun way to show Scooby taking on more responsibility, and having to force himself to be a bit braver for Scrappy’s sake. Having Scrappy around would even be a good excuse for the writers to show him interacting with the other members of the gangbesides Shaggy and Scooby. Imagine Fred cooking up plans with the young dog, happy to be working with someone he doesn’t have to bribe with food to help carry out one of his elaborate plans. Velma would probably have a lot of fun teaching the young animal, and you just know that Daphne would have her own things to teach Scrappy about problem solving. The writers could even have the puppy finally learn to see his uncle more realistically; still looking up to the older dog, but not outright worshipping him, or thinking that he is much more brave and heroic than he really is.
But the question remains; why? Why go to all the effort to bring back a character that the people behind more recentScooby-Doomedia seem happy to leave in the past? The answer is thatScooby-Doohas always been a franchise which embraces its past, even as newer shows attempt to move on from it and shake things up for newer audiences. More recently, variousScooby-Doomedia has been as nostalgic for staples fromScooby-Doohistory as the fans who watch it. Old monsters have been referenced or made reappearances. The second live action movieScooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed(written by James Gunn) even centered its entire plot around a Mystery Inc looking back on their early days after years of successful mystery solving had made them something of local legends in their hometown of Coolsville. That cameo Scrappy had inScooby-Doo: Mystery Incorporatedwas during a scene full of cameos to faces from pastScooby-Dooadventures. Yes, Scrappy hasn’t exactly been forgotten entirely, but why not bring him back in a way that shows love for the character and what he could be, instead of having him play the villain or an embarrassing footnote? Doing that would offer something with a lot more going for it than a throwaway joke, and it would certainly age more gracefully than whatever was going on at the end of that first live action movie, even if there is a certain amount of absurd humor in the fact that Rowan Atkinson once played Scooby’s nephew (there has been worst casting, somewhere).
In recent years, Scrappy-Doo has become the unfortunate scapegoat for a time whenScooby-Doowas faltering creatively. But the problems that plaguedScooby-Doowere at the very least, not entirely Scrappy’s fault. Between the way he was mishandled in the days ofScooby-Doo and Scrappy-Doo,and the way he has been shunted into the franchise’s rear view mirror, he is probablyScooby Doo’s biggest missed opportunity. The creators behind thevarious TV shows and movieshave been willing to explore the idea of “teenagers and talking dog solve mysteries” from every angle, with multiple styles, tones, and even going as far as to have crossoverswith the likes of Kiss, Batman, and Dick Dastardly.With all of that creative thinking on displayit is finally time to do the one thing that they seem reluctant to do, and give both the character and audiences, a version of Scrappy that is just as good as he could be.
